The first systematic review of UK based qualitative research with CYP involved in or at risk of serious violence.
About the review
This review brings together qualitative research from across the UK with children and young people aged 10–24 who are involved in, or at risk of involvement in, serious violence. It focuses on first-hand accounts, allowing young people to explain in their own words how they became involved in violence, how they experienced it, and in some cases, how they moved away from it.
The review included 42 studies published since 2000. These were carried out in a range of settings, including prisons, youth justice services, mainstream and alternative schools, residential care homes, community centres and neighbourhoods experiencing high levels of deprivation. Most participants were male, with only a small number of studies focused on the perspectives of girls. Whilst a significant number of studies included participants from a range of ethnic backgrounds, many provided limited demographic detail.
The studies covered different types of serious violence, such as gang involvement, territorial disputes, carrying weapons, interpersonal aggression, and group violence, such as sectarian violence in Northern Ireland, or between football firms.
Why did YEF fund this review?
At YEF, we understand that to understand what works to prevent children and young people from becoming involved in violence, we need to have a deep understanding of the lives of young people. That’s why we fund the Peer Action Collective, and that is why we have carried out this review. Research with young people is an essential part of building the evidence base — not only because it helps us understand their experiences and highlight gaps, but because it makes sure the solutions we invest in are grounded in their realities and what they tell us matters most.

Main findings
The review identified five main narratives that describe how young people become involved in, or move away from, serious violence.
- Difficult lives: Many children and young people described experiencing childhood trauma, poverty, exclusion from school, and very limited opportunities. These experiences often left them feeling disconnected from society. Violence could become a way to express anger, boredom or a sense of injustice.
- Hypermasculinity: Some studies highlighted the experience of marginalised young men where violence was used to build status, identity and a sense of belonging. Violence can be part of a “tough” or “macho” image and is often performed in front of others. Young women can also be drawn into these lifestyles, either through relationships with young men or through their own involvement.
- Financial reward: For some children and young people, violence is connected to making money in ways that seem quick and easy. In contexts where there are few legitimate opportunities, this can bring self-respect, financial independence and status among peers.
- Blurred boundaries of ‘at risk’: The review found that being “at risk” of violence and being actively involved in violence are not always separate states. Children and young people can move between the two depending on their circumstances. For example, risk can increase in unsupervised peer settings and reduce in more structured environments such as school.
- Towards desistance: Moving away from violence is rarely a single event. It is usually a gradual process shaped by growing maturity, changes in identity, and the influence of supportive relationships. Change is more likely to last when it is reinforced by positive changes in the wider community.
Gaps in the evidence
The review found several important gaps in the current evidence base. There is very little research that focuses on girls and young women. Some minority ethnic groups are under-represented, making it difficult to meaningfully compare experiences across ethnic groups. Migrant populations of young people are rarely the focus of research. There is also little exploration of cultural perspectives on masculinity or of the role of structural racism in shaping opportunities and risks. Evidence about types of violence beyond urban or gang contexts is limited. Finally, the boundary between being “at risk” and actively involved in serious violence remains under-explored, despite its importance for prevention work.
You can explore the studies included in this review, as well as the gaps presented, in this findings map.