Skip to content

Our Outcomes Framework & Measures Database

We’ve identified the outcomes with the most potential to prevent children and young people becoming involved in crime and violence. And through our Measures Database, the best available tools to measure them.

The Youth Endowment Fund’s mission is to prevent children and young people becoming involved in violence. One of the ways we do this is by funding and evaluating projects to find out what works, for whom, when and why.

To understand if a project has an impact in the way that’s intended, we need to know which factors in children and young people’s lives it’s expected to change – these are commonly known as outcomes. We also need a reliable way of measuring any changes that occur.

More broadly, to make sure we  build evidence through our evaluations – and wider research – that contributes to our mission, we need to know which outcomes have the potential to reduce the risk of children and young people becoming involved in crime and violence.

To do this, we’ve partnered with the Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families to produce an Outcomes Framework and Measures Database.


Our Outcomes Framework

Our Outcomes Framework identifies the outcomes with the most potential to prevent children and young people becoming involved in crime and violence.

We know there are lots of things in a child or young person’s life that can influence their likelihood of becoming involved in crime and violence. To illustrate this, we’ve created a graphic to show how our selected outcomes are connected, and the varying influences of family, school, community and societal factors on children and young people’s development.

In our Outcomes Framework, we make distinctions between primary outcomes, secondary outcomes and contextual factors.

  • Primary outcomes are the outcomes with the most potential to decrease young people’s likelihood of becoming involved in crime and violence. We use these to determine whether or not a YEF-funded intervention or programme is considered effective. Most of our evaluations will have just one primary outcome measure.
  • Secondary outcomes provide useful information about the effect an intervention or programme has, and often helps us understand how a programme works. They typically have weaker evidence than primary outcomes or are more indirect in their relationship to youth crime and violence.
  • Contextual factors refer to other important factors about a child or young person’s history or circumstances that help us to understand their individual needs and any changes in primary and secondary outcomes that might occur.

Show:

How will it be used?

This Outcomes Framework will inform our work, and play a crucial role in ensuring that we commission high-quality evaluations. In each of our funding rounds, we’ll select a number of primary outcomes. We’ll use these to identify promising projects and measure their impact (based on the research questions we want the grant round to help us answer).

This Outcomes Framework is meant primarily for our evaluators . But it’s also a useful tool for projects applying for YEF funding and others organisations funding evaluations of the violence prevention programmes (for example, Police and Crime Commissioner’s Offices or Violence Reduction Units). It might also help others with an interest in youth violence prevention, including frontline workers, policy makers, researchers and academics.

Find out more

We’ve produced a guide to accompany our infographic. It includes the full list of outcomes and their definitions, along with more information about the methodology we used to select them. You can download it here:


Our Measures Database

Our Measures Database identifies the best available tools to measure the primary and secondary outcomes in our Outcomes Framework.

To evaluate a project against its intended outcomes, we need to ensure that appropriate measures are used to assess them. By appropriate, we mean measures that are user-friendly (so less prone to error and easy for research participants to complete) and that reliably measure what they are supposed to measure.

Given that lots of measures exist, researchers and practitioners may sometimes find it challenging to identify which is the most appropriate one to use to assess a particular outcome. We’ve created our measures database to help. By providing a selection of measures that have been thoroughly evaluated for their accessibility and psychometric quality, evaluators can make an informed decision about selecting the right outcome measure(s) for their project.

How will it be used?

We hope our Measures Database will be helpful for evaluators working with children and young people to track outcomes. Practically, we’ll use it to guide our evaluators’ choice of measures when designing evaluation, ensuring evaluations measuring the same outcomes are using the same measurement tools wherever possible.

Download our Measures Database

Find out more

We’ve produced the following guide to help you use our Measures Database.

You can read more about how we developed our Measures Database in this technical report.